The UK Government’s response to the Joint Scrutiny Committee on the draft Mental Health Bill offers some hope but there is a long way to go before Government plans can be made into a workable mental health bill, the Mental Health Alliance said today. The Government intends to press ahead with plans to broaden out powers of compulsion and deny professionals the flexibility they need to offer people the right care and support.
Mental Health Alliance Reacts to Government Response
Speaking on the day the Government published its response, Alliance chairman Paul Farmer said:
After seven years and thousands of hours of consultation on this crucial legislation, some of the basic changes required are now being recognised, but we’re a long way from workable legislation.
Mental health workers, service users and carers will today be pleased that the Government has said it will consider improving patients’ rights, for example through advance statements which will give people more say in how they are treated, as well as extra powers for advocates. But they will be disappointed and angry that the Government intends to press ahead with plans to broaden out powers of compulsion and deny professionals the flexibility they need to offer people the right care and support. By rejecting a test of ‘therapeutic benefit’ for people to be compelled, the Government risks clogging up services with people who cannot be treated and should not be there. We know that the system cannot cope with this.
The Alliance welcomes the Government’s pledge to look again at the use of compulsion outside hospital. This controversial plan needs much clearer safeguards.
Our members today call on the Government to continue to work with us to produce a workable Mental Health Bill that has the confidence of those who will have to use it and that will stand the test of time. The Mental Health Alliance will be studying the Government’s response in great detail over the coming days to get more clarity where it is lacking, and we will continue our fight in the coming months for legislation that will work. The next mental health act will outlive the Government and the Mental Health Alliance.
The Alliance welcomes the Government’s responses to the committee’s recommendations that:
- A set of principles should be on the face of the Bill;
- There should be clear exclusions to the definition of ‘mental disorder’.
The Mental Health Alliance is also concerned that the Government has rejected the committee’s recommendations on:
- Making aftercare available free of charge for as long as it is needed;
- Introducing a duty on services to assess people’s needs;
- Offering the same powers for carers as family members currently have.
Comments from Mental Heath Alliance Members
Members of the Mental Heath Alliance today commented on the Government response to the scrutiny committee report:
Lord Adebowale, Chief Executive of Turning Point, said:
“Virtually everything in this bill disproportionately effects black people with mental health problems. Yet there is little in the government response to do anything about the issues and fears they face.”
Richard Brook, Chief Executive of Mind said:
“We hoped that the Government would grasp the opportunity to deliver the necessary legislation for a mental health system delivering effective and compassionate mental healthcare. Yet sadly they have not listened fully to the Scrutiny Committee’s report on top of advice from all other stakeholders to deliver the badly needed solutions. However, there are some benefits that we welcome – and we must now continue to work with and challenge the Government to prevent a stigmatising Bill.”
Tony Zigmond, Honorary Vice President at the Royal College of Psychiatrists, said:
“The Joint Scrutiny Committee of Parliament, established by the Government, received 450 written submissions and took oral evidence from 124 witnesses. Their report made proposals for a Mental Health Act, which would enhance patient care and community, safety and command wide support from patients, their carers and professionals. The Royal College of Psychiatrists is saddened by the Government’s failure to adopt many of the central recommendations of the committee.”
Dr Andrew McCulloch, Chief Executive of the Mental Health Foundation, said:
“Concessions such as Advance Statements, which will give people with mental health problems some say over their care and treatment, are to be welcomed. But it is clear that the Government hasn’t listened to our very serious concerns over the grounds on which people can be treated under compulsion, and other crucial issues. The mental health sector must remain united, and put its shoulder to the campaign for further improvements to the Government’s plans in the coming months.”
Cliff Prior, Chief Executive of Rethink, said:
“Rethink is deeply worried that the Bill still fails to help people with mental illness get help quickly – and fails their families even more – despite some welcome changes to improve rights and safeguards.”
Angela Greatley, Chief Executive of the Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, said:
“The Government has evidently listened to many of the detailed recommendations of the scrutiny committee. But there remains a long way to go before we have a Bill that all those who work in or use mental health services can support and implement.”
Marjorie Wallace, Chief Executive of SANE, said:
“Whilst the Government has met some of the anxieties expressed by organisations in the mental health field, SANE remains concerned that the new proposals will not improve the lives of the majority of mentally ill people and their families. While there are 400 vacancies and rising for consultant psychiatrists, a chronic shortage of mental health nurses and a lack of beds, such measures as compulsory treatment in the community could become a temptingly cheap alternative to in-patient or other skilled 24-hour care. Without imposing a duty to provide the resources for both in-patient care and community teams, any intended reforms could become increased coercion without compassion.”
Ian Hulatt, Mental Health Advisor at the Royal College of Nursing, said:
“The RCN welcomes the government response to the PLS report, but we remain concerned over a number of issues. As the largest occupational group nurses are crucial to the delivery of the proposed Bill. There is a pressing need to recruit more nurses to deliver the Bill and the service changes proposed within it. We still have serious reservations about the controversial issue of non-residential treatment orders. We shall be working hard with our Alliance colleagues to ensure that the workforce and service delivery issues are rigorously considered in our discussions with the government.”
Su Sayer, Chief Executive of United Response, said:
“We work with GPs to support people at an early stage and help prevent their problems from escalating. More investment in early intervention services is crucial and makes economic sense. It would also help to reduce the stigma that millions of people with a mental health need face.”
The Mental Health Alliance is a coalition of 73 organisations working together to secure a better Mental Health Act.
For all media enquiries about today’s report, please contact the Mental Health Foundation’s press office:
- Fran Gorman on 020 7803 1128 / 07967 586489 / email@example.com
- Laura Gibson 020 7803 1130 / firstname.lastname@example.org
Members of the Mental Health Alliance
Members of the Mental Health Alliance include:
Afiya Trust, British Association of Social Workers, British Psychological Society, Caritas- Social Action, College of Occupational Therapists, Ethnic Health Forum North West, GLAD, King’s Fund, Maca, Manic Depression Fellowship, Mental Health Foundation, Mental Health Nurses Association, Mind, National Autistic Society, Prevention of Professional Abuse Network, Rethink severe mental illness, Revolving Doors, Richmond Fellowship, Royal College of Nursing, Royal College of Psychiatrists, SANE, Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, SIRI, The 1990 Trust, Turning Point, UK Federation of Smaller Mental Health Agencies, UKAN, UK Council for Psychotherapy, UNISON, United Response, US Network, Voices Forum, Young Minds, Advocacy Learning and Skills Partnership, African Caribbean Community Initiatives (ACCI), Age Concern England, Alcohol Concern, AWAAZ (Manchester), AWETU, The British Deaf Association, British Medical Association, Carers UK, Caritas, Church of England Mission and Public Affairs Council, Confederation of Indian Organisations, Democratic Health Network, Depression Alliance, Drugscope, Family Welfare Association, Footprints (UK), General Medical Council, Hafal, Having a Voice, Homeless Link, Imagine, JAMI, Justice, Law Society, Mencap, NHS Confederation, Race on the Agenda, RADAR, Refugee Action, Royal College of GPs, Sign, Social Action for Health, Somali Mental Health Project, Supporting Carers Better Network, UK Council for Psychotherapy, West Dorset Mental Health Forum, Women in Secure Hospitals (WISH).